Cases 81 - 90 of 191,245
KRAUS v. Northport VA Medical Center et al
as 2:2024cv03649
Plaintiff:
MR. DANIEL KRAUS
Defendant:
Northport VA Medical Center and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Lyman v. Driving Force Logistics, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
Tyler Lyman
Defendant:
Driving Force Logistics, LLC and Novae, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Jackson v. Parkland Memorial Hospital
as 4:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Sir Gregory P. Jackson
Defendant:
Parkland Memorial Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Tipold v. Ross et al
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Rosa C. Tipold
Defendant:
Tony Wayne Ross and Stephanie Dowdy Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Johnson v. Family Dollar Stores of Mississippi, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores of Mississippi, LLC and John Doe Entities 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Dimitar Petlechkov v. Michael Stengel
as 24-5483
Plaintiff:
DIMITAR PETLECHKOV
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. STENGEL, dba Stengel Law Firm, P.C.
David Babb v. David Isom
as 24-1456
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANTHONY BABB
Defendant:
DAVID ISOM, General Manager for Safe Harbor, RUDY SOCHA, CEO, Wounded Nature Working Veterans, JOHN J. TECKLENBURG, Retired and others
Cook v. Sullivan County Family Court of New York State Unified Court System et al
as 1:2024cv03874
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Cook
Defendant:
Sullivan County Family Court of New York State Unified Court System, Judith Yates, Chief Clerk Anthony McGinty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sago v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 2:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sago
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
