Cases 31 - 40 of 109
Riddick v. Kiser et al
as 7:2020cv00081
Defendant:
Henry Ponton, S. Fletcher, Deborah Ball and others
Plaintiff:
Steve Riddick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitley v. City Of Norfolk
as 2:2019cv00581
Plaintiff:
Tori R. Whitley
Defendant:
The City of Norfolk, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James v. Andrews
as 5:2019hc02292
Petitioner:
Tory Lenard James
Respondent:
Warden Justin Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
STONE et al v. AUTOMONEY, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv01035
Plaintiff:
TIJUANA LESENE, ANITA STONE, ANDRE EASTER and others
Defendant:
AUTOMONEY, INC. and AUTOMONEY NORTH, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Seaborn v. Va. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 7:2019cv00639
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, H. Scott Richeson, A. David Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Jesovha Octavius Seaborn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chisholm v. Whaley et al
as 7:2019cv00591
Defendant:
Sgt. Coleman, Lt. Whaley, Officer Hurley and others
Plaintiff:
Tori Chisholm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Trinity Food Service et al
as 5:2019cv02119
Defendant:
Tory Ervin, Officer S Wilson, Trinity Food Service and others
Plaintiff:
William Kevin Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chisholm v. Elam
as 7:2019cv00353
Plaintiff:
Tori Chisholm
Defendant:
Marcus Elam, B.T. Mitchell, Robert W. Whitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorpe et al v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00332
Defendant:
Denise Malone, A. David Robinson, Tori Raiford and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cottrell, Brian Cavitt, Peter Mukuria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Willand v. Circle K Stores Inc et al
as 0:2019cv01090
Defendant:
Circle K Stores Inc and BCS Restorations LLC
Plaintiff:
Torie Willand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
