Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Stuart et al v. Scottsdale, City of et al
as 2:2021cv01917
Plaintiff:
Mark E Stuart and Virginia G Stuart
Defendant:
Scottsdale, City of, WJ Lane, Unknown Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. County of Santa Cruz et al
as 5:2020cv01619
Plaintiff:
Darin Matthews
Defendant:
Name Unknown Scotts Valley Police Officer Badge No. 5430, Name Unknown Scotts Valley Police Officer Badge No. 5281, City of Scotts Valley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. Sarah et al
as 4:2019cv03185
Defendant:
Academi Co., LT. Unknown Sarah, Commander Unknown Edward and others
Plaintiff:
Steve Oniel Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hafner et al v. Marana, Town of et al
as 4:2015cv00444
Plaintiff:
George Hafner and Alice Hafner
Defendant:
Marana, Town of, Terry Rozema, Unknown Rozema and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
High et al v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2013cv01171
Plaintiff:
Kenneth High and Darlene High
Defendant:
Tucson, City of , Unknown Evans , Unknown McNamara and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brin v. Tanner Medical Staffing LLC et al
as 2:2011cv02100
Defendant:
Maricopa County Superior Court, Unknown Perry, Unknown Robertson and others
Plaintiff:
Stella Brin
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Seawright v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2011cv01304
Plaintiff:
Kini M Seawright
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Corrections, Charles L Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell et al v. Arizona Storage Inns et al
as 2:2010cv00790
Plaintiff:
William D Howell and Howell Law Firm, LLC
Defendant:
Arizona Storage Inns , Kenneth Hess , Rachel Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cwiak v. Scott, et al
as 2:2009cv02686
Plaintiff:
Karen L Cwiak
Defendant:
John Scott , Unknown Scott, Chad Metcalf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
