Cases 11 - 20 of 69
Rains #850456 v. Washington et al
as 2:2020cv00032
Defendant:
M. Hakola, Unknown Part(y)(ies) #3, M. Callentine and others
Plaintiff:
James Raheem Rains #850456
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carson v. Collins et al
as 2:2019cv00149
Defendant:
Lt. Unknown Collins, Officer 36, Sgt. Unknown Jones and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Kreshan Carson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Wilks et al
as 2:2019cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L. Davis
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
L.T. Unknown Collins, Gwen Wilks, Alex Ignatiev and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Magee v. Perry et al
as 3:2019cv00245
Defendant:
Nurse Unknown Collins, Gloria Perry, Nurse Unknown Waltzer and others
Plaintiff:
Kendall K. Magee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorro v. Tucson Police Department et al
as 4:2017cv00533
Plaintiff:
Marvin Arido Sorro
Defendant:
Tucson Police Department, Unknown Boggie, Unknown Jenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mullins v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv01793
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Tracy Haggert and Unknown Collins
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jerome Burl Mullins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cary #269436 v. MDOC et al
as 1:2016cv01429
Plaintiff:
Bryan Allen Cary #269436
Defendant:
Sherman Campbell, Unknown Smith, Unknown Fenby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Collins
as 4:2016cv01639
Plaintiff:
Ventress L. Smith
Defendant:
Unknown Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones #294300 v. Collins et al
as 1:2015cv01212
Plaintiff:
Davie L. Jones #294300, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Collins, Unknown Williams, M. Schafer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv01902
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Chris Moody, R Dorsey and others
Plaintiff:
Albert L Brinkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
