Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Mitchell v. Strata et al
as 1:2024cv01045
Plaintiff:
Raymon A. Mitchell
Defendant:
Frank Strata, Brandon Watwood, Robert J. Cravens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heaven v. Marion County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2023cv00449
Plaintiff:
Jerome Heaven, Jr.
Defendant:
Marion County Sheriff's Office, Billy Woods, FNU Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-11445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-10798
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOON, STEVE UPON and others
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-10630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Hawkins v. Ramos et al
as 6:2022cv01282
Plaintiff:
Edward Dewayne Hawkins
Defendant:
Sgt. FNU Ramos and Cpl FNU Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. CCA et al
as 5:2022cv03157
Plaintiff:
Carl Williams
Defendant:
CCA, (fnu) Leon, (fnu) May and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Daker v. Ward et al
as 6:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Jack Koon, Steve Upon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowlson v. Ramos et al
as 5:2022cv00054
Plaintiff:
Arthur Bowlson
Defendant:
FNU Ramos, FNU George, John 1-10 Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
