Cases 1 - 10 of 116
Alvarado-Guerrero v. USA
as 8:2024cv00154
Petitioner:
Gustavo Alvarado-Guerrero
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jesus Alvarado-Alvarado v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-1501
Petitioner:
Jesus Alvarado-Alvarado
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States and Alejandro Mayorkas, The Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Alvarado v. Moore et al
as 0:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Juan Alvarado
Defendant:
Isaiah Moore, Matthew McNeely, Joseph LeFevere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelso v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03073
Plaintiff:
Larry G Kelso
Defendant:
3M Company, CHCA Pearland L.P. doing business as HCA Houston Healthcare Pearland, HCA Pearland GP, Inc. and others
Ackerman et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02686
Plaintiff:
Alexander Ackerman, Jorge Ibrain Adrian, Jose Dimas Alfaro and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Alvarado, Jr. v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00302
Petitioner:
Ruben Alvarado, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Broach v. Stubbs et al
as 4:2023cv04064
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dale Broach
Defendant:
Sergeant Chett Stubbs, Deputy Issiac Alvarado, Jailer Synamin Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado v. USA
as 4:2023cv00453
Petitioner:
Jose Alvarado
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Oscar Alvarado-Chirinos v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-2294
Petitioner:
Oscar Rolando Alvarado-Chirinos
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Maria Alvarado v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 23-1900
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Maria Alvarado
Defendant / Appellant:
DST Systems, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
