Cases 1 - 10 of 853
TERRELL v. WHATLEY et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
WILLIE JAMES TERRELL, JR
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TABATHA WHATLEY, WARDEN BENJAMIN FORD, TARMARSHE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun v. Smalls et al
as 6:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Joshua Calhoun
Defendant:
Officer FNU Smalls and OIG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CALHOUN v. LYNCH et al
as 2:2024cv01609
Petitioner:
RAPHAEL R. CALHOUN
Respondent:
Julie Lynch, FRANCISCO LUTTECKE, Frederick D Benton, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vines v. Calhoun County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
George Taylor Carl Vines
Defendant:
Calhoun County Sheriff Department and Steven Hinkley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Calhoun
as 3:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Jarivs Jerome Hampton, Jr.
Defendant:
Ward Calhoun
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wilson v. 37th Circuit Court et al
as 1:2024cv00228
Petitioner:
Kevin Theodore Wilson
Respondent:
37th Circuit Court, Calhoun County Sheriff's Department and Steven Hinkley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Garza v. Calhoun Police Dept. et al
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Ruben Garza
Defendant:
Calhoun Police Dept. and Arresting Officers Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CALHOUN v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2024cv00559
Petitioner:
RAPHAEL R. CALHOUN
Respondent:
JULIE LYNCH, FRANCISCO LUTTECKE, FREDERICK D. BENTON, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Terrell v. Calhoun
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Morris Andre Terrell
Defendant:
Sheriff Unknown Calhoun
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
