Cases 1 - 10 of 259
Orso v. Jackson
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Ricky A. Orso, Jr.
Defendant:
Heath Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Taylor et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lamar Hill
Defendant:
Heath Taylor and Steve Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. PENIX et al
as 5:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
LEMUEL L COOPER
Defendant:
PENIX, M BREWER and HEATH HOLLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. DIXON et al
as 5:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
LEMUEL L COOPER
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON and HEATH HOLLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. HOLLAND et al
as 5:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
LEMUEL L COOPER
Defendant:
HEATH HOLLAND and M BREWER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Partlow v Chambers
as 4:2024cv00030
Petitioner:
Heath D. Partlow
Respondent:
Brian Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Roy Devon Hill
Defendant:
Fulton County Jail, Pat Labat, Lenwood Cochran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Johnson et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lamar Hill
Defendant:
Steve Johnson, Dana Howell, Rick Chancey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. FINKE et al
as 3:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
LARRANCE DURELLE MOORE
Defendant:
OKALOOSA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, OKALOOSA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, DAVID RICHARD FINKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Helvey v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Orange County)
as 6:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
Heath Lee Helvey
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
