Cases 1 - 10 of 754
Younger et al v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03091
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Younger, Barbara Frantz, Kora L. Liles and others
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Donna Hook and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huddleston (ID 99733) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03086
Plaintiff:
Sharon Huddleston
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Dona Hook and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Huddleston v. Wal-Mart Stores East L.P.
as 1:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Tommy Huddleston
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Powell v. Decicco et al
as 5:2024cv00511
Defendant:
Jessica Lynn Cook, Law Office of Jessica Vicknair L L C, Lauren S Fellers and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Short Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
William Fly v. United States, et al
as 24-1566
Plaintiff:
William Anthony Fly, also known as Tony Fly, also known as Toni Fly
Defendant:
United States, United States Department of Justice, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Yeboah et al v. U.S. Bank, National Association et al
as 3:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Cheryl L. Yeboah and Kwadwo A. Yeboah
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, National Association, State of Connecticut, Robert Vacchelli and others
Huddleston et al v. Anderson et al
as 5:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Jamia Huddleston
Defendant:
Ray Charles Anderson, Landstar Inway Inc and Old Republic Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle
Huddleston v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
Michael Huddleston
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
