Cases 41 - 50 of 250
Ochoa v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv02283
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY OCHOA
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Officer Demetrio Muro, Star No. 9180, Officer Jonathan Martinez, Star No. 17514 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-8016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Finney v. Ochoa-Bruck et al
as 2:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Roland Willis Finney
Defendant:
Gloria Ochoa-Bruck and Ryan Dalessi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Baker et al v. Claiborne County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2021cv00380
Plaintiff:
RB, Joe Baker and Pam Baker
Defendant:
Claiborne County, Tennessee, Bob Brooks, Kenneth Joseph Ochoa, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv08461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Licari v. Hughes et al
as 1:2021cv04034
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Licari
Defendant:
Rena Hughes, Mary Kay Holthus, Elizabeth Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jane Doe v. Board of Education of Glenbard Township High School District 87 et al
as 1:2021cv04909
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Board of Education of Glenbard Township High School District 87, Peter Monaghan, David Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv06377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Joseph McLaughlin v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2021cv01118
Defendant:
Kyle Smit, County of San Bernardino, Adan Ochoa and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph McLaughlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
