Cases 1 - 10 of 123,919
Roy v. Nightingale et al
as 3:2024cv03549
Plaintiff:
Anand Roy
Defendant:
Todd Nightingale, Ronald Kisling, Aida Alvarez and others
Smith v. City and County of Denver, Colorado et al
as 1:2024cv01636
Plaintiff:
Elijah Smith
Defendant:
City and County of Denver, Colorado, Mike's Restaurant Group doing business as Hayter's & Co. and Adam Glasby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
Shyla Smith
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. COCROFT et al
as 2:2024cv03208
Plaintiff:
DEONDRE EUGENE SMITH
Defendant:
Judge Kimberly Cocroft, JEFF ZEZECH, David F. Zeyen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jabbar v. BWW Resources, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03202
Plaintiff:
Ms. Hakimah Jabbar, r
Defendant:
BWW Resources, LLC and Ms. Sally Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
SMITH et al v. CENCORA, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv02558
Plaintiff:
TAMI SMITH and EDWARD SKIBINSKI
Defendant:
CENCORA, INC. and THE LASH GROUP, LLC
Ann deWet v. G. Rollyson, Jr.
as 24-1534
Plaintiff:
ANN BARCLAY DEWET, and and LAURENCE E.T. SMITH, in their capacities as personal representatives of the Estate of Ann Tierney Smith
Defendant:
G. RUSSELL ROLLYSON, JR., in his official and individual capacities
Kyle Dunlap v. Shelbie Smith
as 24-3514
Petitioner:
KYLE J. DUNLAP
Respondent:
SHELBIE SMITH, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
