Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Schubert v. Avery et al
as 3:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Allan Douglas Schubert
Defendant:
Krystal Avery, Shannon W. Phelps, James Wills and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hatten v. Laurel School District
as 2:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
Avery Hatten
Defendant:
Laurel School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arnold et al v. Willis et al
as 3:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
Keisha Arnold and Keith Jackson
Defendant:
Avery Willis, Kenya McCarty, James Land and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schubert v. Avery
as 3:2022cv00321
Plaintiff:
Allan D. Schubert
Defendant:
C/O Avery
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Shoemake v. Forrest County Adult Detention Facility et al
as 2:2021cv00165
Plaintiff:
Dustin Karl Shoemake
Defendant:
Forrest County Adult Detention Facility, Avery Hatten, C-59 and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopson v. Avery et al
as 3:2021cv00708
Plaintiff:
Edward James Hopson
Defendant:
Betty Sue Hopson Avery and Ashley Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moore v. Union County Mississippi et al
as 3:2021cv00158
Plaintiff:
Richard Moore
Defendant:
Union County Mississippi, Jimmy Edwards, Avery Adair and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cotton v. 10TH Circuit of Lauderdale County et al
as 3:2021cv00188
Plaintiff:
Avery George Cotton
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
State of Mississippi and 10TH Circuit of Lauderdale County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clark v. Tonins et al
as 3:2019cv00247
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, Randy Manning, Avery Tonins and others
Plaintiff:
Jeff Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00141
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
