Cases 1 - 10 of 1,169
Childress v. USA
as 3:2024cv00815
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Childress, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
AmGUARD Insurance Co v. Natchitoches Parish Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
AmGUARD Insurance Company
Defendant:
Natchitoches Parish Sheriff's Office, Natchitoches Detention Center, Sheriff Stuart Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas, Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01719
Defendant:
Doe 16, Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Childress v. Interface Communications Company
as 1:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
Timothy Childress
Defendant:
Interface Communications Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1612 - FMLA: Leave Requirements
Childress v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Myles Childress
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Childress et al v. City of Cincinnati, Ohio et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Akil Childress, Emma Sue Long, Charlene Berkhalter and others
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati, Ohio, Jan-Michele Lemon Kearney, Victoria Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hundal v. Islas, et al.
as 24-2303
Plaintiff:
GURKIRN HUNDAL
Defendant:
RUBEN ISLAS, JR., MARTHA ISLAS ENRIQUEZ, JOE ZUNIGA and others
United States of America v. Childress
as 24-2162
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ROBERT LEE CHILDRESS, JR.
Gurkirn Hundal v. Ruben Islas Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
Gurkirn Hundal
Defendant:
Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas, Martha Islas Enriquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
