Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Reid v. Renfro et al
as 2:2024cv02019
Plaintiff:
Warnell Reid
Defendant:
. Renfro, . Zieglar, . Clendenen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv07455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Byron Clendenen v. Volkswagen Group of America, I
as 20-15887
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BYRON CLENDENEN
Defendant / Appellee:
VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC., a New Jersey corporation, DBA Volkswagen of America, Inc. and VOLKSWAGEN AG
CLENDENEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv68708
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CLENDENEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clendenen v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 3:2018cv07040
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Byron Clendenen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CLENDENEN v. WASHINGTON COUNTY LYS
as 2:2017cv01444
Plaintiff:
JESSE CLENDENEN
Defendant:
WASHINGTON COUNTY LYS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edward Sialoi, et al v. City of San Diego, et al
as 17-55786
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD SIALOI, ESTATE OF SEPTEMBER SIALOI, by her husband and successor in interest, Sialoi Sialoi, Jr., FOLENI SIALOI and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SAN DIEGO, ALLEN SLUSS, MIGUEL GARCIA and others
Edward Sialoi, et al v. City of San Diego, et al
as 17-55790
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EDWARD SIALOI, ESTATE OF SEPTEMBER SIALOI, by her husband and successor in interest, Sialoi Sialoi, Jr., FOLENI SIALOI and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF SAN DIEGO, ALLEN SLUSS, MIGUEL GARCIA and others
Defendant:
DOES, 1-30
Clendenen v. Steak N Shake Operations, Inc.
as 4:2017cv01506
Defendant:
Steak N Shake Operations, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Corinna Clendenen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
