Cases 1 - 10 of 334
Jumping Cholla Tucson v. House of Trix
as 2:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
Jumping Cholla Tucson LLC; an Arizona Limited Liability Company doing business as Defy Tucson
Defendant:
House of Trix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Eckerd v. Jump
as 2:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
Andrew William Eckerd
Respondent:
E. Neal Jump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hasuan v. Ferra et al
as 2:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Asaad Amir Hasuan
Defendant:
George Ferra, Glynn County Detention Center and Sheriff E. Neal Jump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hasuan v. Ferra et al
as 2:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Asaad Amir Hasuan
Defendant:
Major George Ferra, Sheriff E. Neal Jump and Glynn County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson, et al. v. Jump Trading, LLC
as 24-670
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NICK PATTERSON, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and MICHAEL TOBIAS
Defendant / Appellant:
JUMP TRADING, LLC
State National Insurance Company, Inc. et al v. Skidmore et al
as 1:2024cv00421
Petitioner:
State National Insurance Company, Inc. and Next Insurance US Company
Respondent:
Jeremy Skidmore, Holly Skidmore, Earnest Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Eckerd v. Jump et al
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Eckerd
Defendant:
Sheriff E. Neal Jump, Rebecca J. Walden, Roger B. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Resurrection House Ministries, Inc v. City of Brunswick et al
as 2:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Resurrection House Ministries, Inc
Defendant:
City of Brunswick, Cosby H. Johnson, Julie T. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
