Cases 1 - 10 of 553
Dawkins v. Newberry County et al
as 8:2024cv03435
Plaintiff:
Jonathan C. Dawkins
Defendant:
Newberry County and Fairfield County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Newberry v. McMaster
as 1:2024cv03397
Plaintiff:
Phillip D. Newberry
Defendant:
Henry McMaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
US v. Natasha Newberry
as 24-4297
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
NATASHA NICOLE NEWBERRY, a/k/a Natasha N. Newberry
Newberry v. South Carolina, State of
as 1:2024cv01678
Petitioner:
Phillip D. Newberry
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of and South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perkins v. Panorama Towers Condominium Unit Owners Association, Inc., et al.
as 24-3329
Plaintiff:
PRESTON D. PERKINS, JR.
Defendant:
PANORAMA TOWERS CONDOMINIUM UNIT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., DENNIS KARIGER, LUCKY LACT, LLC and others
Sainiak v. Newberry et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Garrett Raymond Sainiak
Defendant:
Newberry, Rainer, A. Webrzynowicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newberry v. Cofty et al
as 1:2024cv01679
Plaintiff:
Phillip D. Newberry and Flip
Defendant:
Patricia M. Cofty, Michael J. Prodan, Steve E. Sizemore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Brooks v. Penzone et al
as 2:2024cv01141
Plaintiff:
Solomon Brooks and King Solomon Sekhemre El Neter
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Kevin McMahill, Andrea Kever and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newberry v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv02639
Plaintiff:
Phillip D. Newberry
Defendant:
Alan Wilson and Kenneth Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
