Cases 1 - 10 of 642
Mahmoud v. Holz et al
as 2:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud
Defendant:
Holz, Bartlette, Brendal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erickson, et al. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al.
as 24-2498
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERICKSON and SHELLEY ANN ERICKSON
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., and its employees and or agents, REBECCA DIETRICH, in her individual capacity, and employee and.or agent for and as successor in interest and the Plaintiffs mortgage successor in interest WAMU other JP Morgan Chase NA, TARA L. TUCKER, notary in her individual capacity and employee and/or agent for other JP Morgan Chase and others
Olsen #119876 v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
Troy Timothy Olsen
Defendant:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meadows et al v. Haws et al
as 2:2024cv00859
Plaintiff:
Veronica Ruiz Meadows and GrandMaster G-Man Meadows
Defendant:
David Haws, Barry L Olsen, Estate of Darrell Davis/Jodi McCallister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burch v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05286
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Burch
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Byrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael D. Arthurs v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02714
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Arthurs
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC Company Corporation doing business as Mr. Cooper, Jay Bray, Busy Burr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Olsen v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Olsen
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Aquatech Corporation v. Clark Building Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Aquatech Corporation dba United Aqua Group
Defendant:
Clark Building Group, Inc. and Clark Olsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
