Cases 1 - 10 of 5,633
ALVAREZ PEREZ v. R. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv05715
Petitioner:
JUAN ALVAREZ PEREZ
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PEREZ V SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2024cv00178
Petitioner:
Julio A. Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Riley v. Linthicum et al
as 3:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Josh Randall Riley
Defendant:
Lanette Linthicum, Richard Lu, Alexander Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alfredo Martinez-Perez v. Gina Clark, et al
as 24-1672
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO MARTINEZ-PEREZ
Defendant:
GINA CLARK, Superintendent - SCI Chester, M QUINN, Grievance Coordinator - SCI Chester and DR. PAUL G. LITTLE, Doctor - SCI Chester
Benigno Perez-Aguilar v. Jeff Howard
as 24-1340
Petitioner:
BENIGNO PEREZ-AGUILAR
Respondent:
JEFF HOWARD, Warden
Perez v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv00895
Plaintiff:
Arely Buendia Perez
Defendant:
Arizona, State of and Richard Timmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villanueva et al v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Quirino Villanueva, Alex Arnold, Samuel Jimenez-Perez and others
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, Jacob LNU and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. USA
as 1:2024cv00121
Petitioner:
Yuri Maikel Hernandez Perez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jarmon v. Comal County Jail et al
as 5:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Ersala Jarmon
Defendant:
Comal County Jail, Sheriff Mark Reynolds, Officer FNU Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Osborn et al
as 9:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Perez
Defendant:
Michael Osborn, Lee Harrigan, Matthew Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
