Cases 31 - 40 of 71
Sauermilch Perez v. City of Omaha et al
as 8:2020cv00476
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Metro Bus System, Park Rangers and others
Plaintiff:
Tanya Nicole Sauermilch Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sauermilch Perez v. Burlington trailways et al
as 8:2020cv00471
Plaintiff:
Tanya Nicole Sauermilch Perez
Defendant:
Grey hound bus lines and Burlington trailways
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sauermilch Perez v. Open Door Mission Lydia House
as 8:2020cv00430
Plaintiff:
Tanya Nicole Sauermilch Perez
Defendant:
Open Door Mission Lydia House
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez et al v. Century Asphalt Company et al
as 8:2020cv00210
Defendant:
Century Asphalt Company and Stephen Dale Ferguson
Plaintiff:
David V. Perez and Debra K. Perez
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Perez v. Noah's Ark Processors, LLC
as 4:2019cv03016
Respondent:
Noah's Ark Processors, LLC
Interested Party:
United Food & Commercial Workers Local Union No. 293
Petitioner:
Leonard J. Perez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160 (1) National Labor Relations Act
Perez v. Johnson
as 8:2019cv00002
Respondent:
Brad Johnson
Petitioner:
Emmanuel Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Endicott v. INS "Perez" et al
as 8:2018cv00554
Defendant:
U.S. Customs Immigration Services, INS "Perez" and F. Gerard Heinauer
Plaintiff:
Michael James Endicott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mix-Perez v. USA
as 8:2018cv00078
Petitioner:
Julian Mix-Perez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Perez et al v. Does 1-10 et al
as 4:2018cv03014
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-10, Michael Doremus, Jerry Esch and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Espino, John Espino, Joshua Espino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saylor v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2017cv00472
Defendant:
Natalie Baker, Dennis Bakewell, Fred Britten and others
Plaintiff:
James Saylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
