Cases 11 - 20 of 545
Pierce et al v. Gandy et al
as 4:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Pierce and William Russelburg
Counter Claimant:
Chantel Gandy
Defendant:
Bubba Gandy Seafood Cajun X Market LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Pierce v. LeMaster
as 0:2024cv00007
Petitioner:
David L. Pierce
Respondent:
David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ross v. Kent, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Terrell Ross
Defendant:
Kent, County of, Kent County Correctional Facility, Grand Rapids, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donna Dickinson v. Wilson County Sheriff's Office, et al
as 24-5005
Plaintiff:
DONNA DICKINSON
Defendant:
WILSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, JOSEPH PIERCE, in his individual capacity and WILSON COUNTY, TN
Pierce et al v. Premier Health Partners
as 3:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
Gloria Pierce, Christine Hughes and Michael Finley
Defendant:
Premier Health Partners
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
William Washington, Jr.In re: William Washington, Jr.
as 23-3888
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM PIERCE WASHINGTON, JR.
Pierce v. Davidson County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2023cv00962
Plaintiff:
Cornelius D. Pierce
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff Office, Darron Hall, Carla Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. LeMaster
as 0:2023cv00086
Petitioner:
David L. Pierce
Respondent:
Warden David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Roger Pierce v. Williams, et al
as 23-1800
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER PIERCE
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT WILLIAMS, SERGEANT . BURLERSON, OFFICER SMOLINSKI and others
Roger Pierce v. Washtenaw County, MI Jail, et al
as 23-1796
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER PIERCE
Defendant / Appellee:
WASHTENAW COUNTY, MI JAIL, DARYL PARKER, Doctor, PATRICE MORGAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
