Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Terry Ofori v. C. Long
as 26-6777
Plaintiff:
TERRY K. OFORI
Defendant:
C. LONG, M. D. POWERS, MR. RUTLEDGE and others
Stapleton v. Collins
as 1:2026cv00066
Plaintiff:
David Lee Stapleton
Defendant:
Evan Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stapleton v. Lozano
as 26-40373
Plaintiff:
Dawn Stapleton, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Joshua Stapleton and Jacqueline Louise Stapleton
Defendant:
Ernesto Lozano, Justin Lee Becerra, Cesar Solis and others
Jallow v. Salerno et al
as 1:2026cv12754
Plaintiff:
Yaya Jallow
Defendant:
Michael Dante Salerno, Victoria M Fulginiti, Patrick Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Michael Stapleton v. Birkholz et al
as 2:2026cv06284
Plaintiff:
Michael Stapleton
Defendant:
Warden Birkholz, John Doe Clinical Director and John Doe Health Service Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Meyers v. Duncan et al
as 7:2026cv00416
Petitioner:
David Meyers
Respondent:
A. Duncan, D. Anderson, M. Pozeg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valenti v. Stapleton et al
as 5:2026cv00162
Plaintiff:
Anthony Valenti
Defendant:
Peter Stapleton and Blackridge Operating, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Franshon Stapleton v. USA
as 26-1999
Applicant:
FRANSHON STAPLETON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Franshon Stapleton v. USA
as 26-1995
Petitioner:
FRANSHON STAPLETON, also known as SHON, also known as BIG SHON, also known as BIRD, also known as BIG BIRD, also known a B.O.N., also known as CHRIS, also known as FRANSOHN STAPLETON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
