Cases 1 - 10 of 237
Larch v. Prosecuting Attorney et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Tanner Moren Eagle Larch
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney and United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
US v. Tanner Larch
as 24-6331
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TANNER MOREN EAGLE LARCH
Llewellyn v. Coleman Dining Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01226
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth A. Llewellyn
Defendant:
Coleman Dining Group, Inc. d/b/a Coleman Public House and Brian Tanner
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Mitchell et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00609
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
George Mitchell, Robert Hendren, Ralph Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Coleman v. The City of Norfolk, Virginia et al
as 2:2024cv00045
Defendant:
Leandra Mae Tanner, The City of Norfolk, Virginia, Robert Foley and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Tanner v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00795
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Tanner
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Joseph Mays v. Jennifer Saad
as 23-7127
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH RANDOLPH MAYS
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNIFER SAAD, RICHARD HUDGINS, MS. R. THOMPSON and others
Stilp v. I.C.P. SRL et al
as 8:2023cv05395
Plaintiff:
Tanner Stilp
Defendant:
I.C.P. SRL and I.C.P. Aviation North America LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jermall Brown v. BOCSE McGuire, Esq.
as 23-2110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERMALL BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
BOCSE MCGUIRE, ESQ., MARTIN ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY, RONIKA SUMLIN, Magistrate and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
