Cases 31 - 40 of 343
Ness v. White
as 2:2023cv00566
Petitioner:
Tanner Matthew Ness
Respondent:
Dan White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USSEC v. Matthew Beasley, et al
as 23-15512
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
MATTHEW WADE BEASLEY, BEASLEY LAW GROUP PC, JEFFREY J. JUDD and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
OMID SHAHABE and KRISTIE YOUNG, Proposed Intervenors
Receiver:
GEOFF WINKLER
Christianson v. Aargon Agency, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00517
Plaintiff:
Tanner Christianson
Defendant:
Aargon Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Robert Perkins v. Robert Carlson et al
as 2:2023cv02283
Plaintiff:
Robert Perkins
Defendant:
Robert Carlson, William Bettencourt, David Tanner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Patterson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
Tanner Patterson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
John Tanner v. Acushnet Company et al
as 8:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
John Tanner
Defendant:
Acushnet Company and Acushnet Holdings Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Thomas Stewart, Jr. v. Arizona, State of, et al
as 23-15173
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS STEWART, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
ARIZONA, STATE OF, MARICOPA, COUNTY OF, D SHELL RYAN, #09838 and others
Mendoza v. Owens et al
as 4:2023cv05005
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Velasquez Mendoza
Defendant:
Mark Owens, Robert Smith, Susan Key and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v Strange et al
as 3:2023cv05008
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jay Perez
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Karie Rainer, Traci Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
