Cases 1 - 10 of 68
EDWARDS v. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM INC
as 4:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
AUDRA EDWARDS
Defendant:
1-800-FLOWERS.COM INC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv09223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Reyes v. 1-800-FLOWERS.com, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv40178
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Reyes
Defendant:
1-800-FLOWERS.com, Inc. and Interactions LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Kernes v. 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02996
Plaintiff:
Nicole Kernes
Defendant:
1-800-Flowers.com, Inc. and Interactions LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Packer v. Raging Capital Management, LLC
as 23-367
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brad Packer, derivatively on behalf of 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
Raging Capital Management, LLC, Raging Capital Master Fund, Ltd., 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc. and others
1-800-Flowers.com, Inc. et al v. Edible IP, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01524
Plaintiff:
1-800-Flowers.com, Inc. and 800-Flowers, Inc.
Defendant:
Edible IP, LLC and Edible Arrangements, LLC
Edible IP, LLC et al v. 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc. et al
as 3:2022mc00094
Plaintiff:
Edible IP, LLC and Edible Arrangements, LLC
Defendant:
1-800-Flowers.com, Inc. and 800-Flowers, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
All Points Digital, LLC
Hindi v. 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, INC.,
as 0:2022cv61733
Plaintiff:
Jamil Hindi
Defendant:
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, INC.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Orsino v. 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc.
as 0:2022cv60928
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Orsino
Defendant:
1-800-Flowers.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
