Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Huang v. Golden Seafood Palace Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv04506
Plaintiff:
Hai Feng Huang
Defendant:
Golden Seafood Palace Inc., Golden Seafood Palace 18 Inc., Joninki Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lin v. Blanche
as 26-1972
Petitioner:
GUO FENG LIN
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv07453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01796
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ya-Wen Feng v. City Of Oakland et al
as 3:2026cv06994
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Ya-Wen Feng
Defendant:
City Of Oakland and Federal Bureau Investigation Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee Ming Building, LLC v. Ya-Wen Feng et al
as 3:2026cv06546
Plaintiff:
Lee Ming Building, LLC
Defendant:
Yvonne Ya-Wen Feng, Jianbiao Huang and Pelzen Zhu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Han et al v. Point Ruston LLC et al
as 3:2026cv05697
Plaintiff:
Bingru Han, Bo Liu, Changjun Gu and others
Defendant:
Point Ruston LLC, Point Ruston Phase II LLC, Loren M Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
