Cases 1 - 10 of 437
Davis et al v. Grill et al
as 2:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Jacob Stephen Davis and Baylee Samuel Farrell
Defendant:
Steven Grill, Shawn Wead, Jody Bradley, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kolak v. Backerville, et al
as 24-1182
Plaintiff:
WALTER M.J. KOLAK
Defendant:
DENISE BACKERVILLE, MR. CARTER, ARAPHAHOE SHERIFF, ARAPAHOE COUNTY and others
Flores v. Borla
as 5:2024cv02238
Plaintiff:
Pablo G. Flores
Defendant:
Edward J. Borla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02969
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Flores
Defendant:
The State of New York, Department of Corrections Community Supervision, Officer S. Mentigny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTSON v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY WAYNE ROBERTSON
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, GARDENER, MAGGIE BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez-Flores v. Sample et al
as 3:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
Julio Perez-Flores
Defendant:
Sample and Osborn Correcional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. Nassau County Sheriff's Dept.
as 2:2024cv01611
Plaintiff:
Mr. Christopher Flores
Defendant:
Nassau County Sherrifs Dept. and Nassau County Sheriff's Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLORES v. PUGH et al
as 3:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FLORES
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHAD PUGH, AUSTIN LEE ALLIGOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLORES v. FINCH et al
as 1:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
HECTOR FLORES, JR.
Defendant:
FINCH and HACKMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Chapin, et al
as 24-1010
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID CHAPIN, JESSICA AGGSON, FNU STEIN, Lt. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
