Cases 11 - 20 of 563
Flores v. Daniels et al
as 7:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Adrian Flores
Defendant:
J.A. Daniels and Richlands Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Fox et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Robert Fox, Thomas Elsberry, William English and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jimenez Flores v. Diverse Masonry Corporation et al
as 8:2023cv03215
Plaintiff:
Carlos Fernando Jimenez Flores
Defendant:
Diverse Masonry Corporation and Lance McCauley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
FLORES v. EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR.
as 1:2023cv01025
Petitioner:
JUAN C. FLORES
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv03169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cesar Flores Nolasco v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2131
Petitioner:
CESAR FLORES NOLASCO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Rudolph Flores v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv05386
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
