Cases 1 - 10 of 12
LASK v. JONES et al
as 3:2023cv02987
Plaintiff:
SUSAN LASK
Defendant:
JOHANNA BARBA JONES, TIMOTHY J MCNAMARA, STUART J. RABNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matieu v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv05387
Defendant:
OFFICER GREGORY MCNAMARA (TAX ID 953091), CITY OF NEW YORK, John And Jane Doe 1through 10 and others
Plaintiff:
YVES MATIEU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
CRESCI v. MCNAMARA et al
as 2:2018cv16207
Defendant:
CHARLES CENTINARO, OFFICE OF ATTORNEY ETHICS and TIMOTHY J MCNAMARA
Plaintiff:
PETER J. CRESCI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arunachalam v. Davila et al
as 3:2018cv02488
Plaintiff:
Lakshmi Arunachalam
Defendant:
Edward J. Davila, Elizabeth D. Laporte, Eric M. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Thibodeaux v. McNamara et al
as 2:2017cv01139
Plaintiff:
Charles H Thibodeaux
Defendant:
A J McNamara, Lester Y. Tamashiro, Marvin Opotowsky and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Thibodeaux v. McNamara et al
as 1:2017cv00046
Plaintiff:
Charles H. Thibodeaux
Defendant:
A. J. McNamara, Lester Y. Tamashiro, Marvin Opotowsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Doe v. BCB Community Bank, et al
as 16-4394
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
BCB COMMUNITY BANK
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY J. MCNAMARA, Individually, CHARLES CENTINARO, Individually and OFFICE OF ATTORNEY ETHICS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hyra et al v. City of Carmel New York et al
as 7:2009cv08655
Plaintiff:
Marek Hyra and Eryk Hyra
Defendant:
City of Carmel New York, Putnam County Office of the Sheriff, Christopher Spiconardi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
