Cases 1 - 10 of 624
KING v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv00642
Plaintiff:
EDWARD LEO KING, JR.
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
King v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv02047
Plaintiff:
Troy Demond King
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
King v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
Paul E. King
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Assyria M Vierra King I v. Martin OMalley
as 2:2024cv01827
Plaintiff:
Assyria M Vierra King I
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Crunk v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Nieesha Castle-King Crunk
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
KING v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
KAIYA J. KING
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Robert John King v. Martin J. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Robert John King
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
King v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv05750
Plaintiff:
Derrick King
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
King v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv06144
Plaintiff:
Kelsey King
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
King v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. King and Patricia A King
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
