Cases 1 - 10 of 3,566
Kramer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Derrick Robert Kramer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Kenneth Banks v. Foundation Automotive Corporation, et al
as 24-3371
Plaintiff:
KENNETH BANKS
Defendant:
FOUNDATION AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION, FOUNDATION AUTO HOLDINGS, LLC, KEVIN KUTSCHINSKI and others
Tuerpe v. Slootman et al
as 5:2024cv02502
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tuerpe
Defendant:
Frank Slootman, Michael Scarpelli, Benoit Dageville and others
CLOUD SYSTEMS HOLDCO IP LLC v. KRAMER ELECTRONICS USA, INC.
as 3:2024cv05578
Plaintiff:
CLOUD SYSTEMS HOLDCO IP LLC
Defendant:
KRAMER ELECTRONICS USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Kramer v. Broomfield et al
as 4:2024cv02417
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Kramer
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, Ralph Diaz, J. Clark Kelso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olivo v. Reed et al
as 2:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Melissa Ann Olivo
Defendant:
Susan B Reed, Monica Comitsky, Karmen Kelsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whitfield v. Kramer et al
as 4:2024cv04060
Plaintiff:
Hezekiah Whitfield
Defendant:
Kasey Kramer, Jason Garza, Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kramer v. Probation
as 8:2024cv00123
Petitioner:
Tim Kramer
Respondent:
Probation
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Slootman et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Patrick M. Murphy, Jr.
Defendant:
Frank Slootman, Michael P. Scarpelli, Benoit Dageville and others
Buffington et al v. sPay, Inc. d/b/a Stack Sports
as 7:2024cv02541
Plaintiff:
Steven Buffington, Nancy Helmold, Sarah Kramer and others
Defendant:
sPay, Inc. d/b/a Stack Sports
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
