Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Wilson v. GRHT, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv02889
Plaintiff:
Carissa M. Wilson
Defendant:
GRHT, Inc. doing business as Vive Hydration Therapy, Tristan O'Connell and Daniel Kubli
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
WILSON v. CHATTAHOOCHEE SLEEP CENTER, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00088
Defendant:
BRYANT HOUSTON, CHATTAHOOCHEE SLEEP CENTER LLC and LETITIA HOUSTON
Plaintiff:
MISTY M WILSON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Wood v. Elite Eye Care & Optical LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00026
Defendant:
Cade M Wilson and Elite Eye Care & Optical LLC
Plaintiff:
Dylan Wood
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Vecchio v. Quest Diagnostics Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv05165
Plaintiff:
Vecchio, Michelanne Shane, Kamika Johnson and others
Defendant:
Quest Diagnostics Inc, ExamOne LLC, Quest Diagnostics Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
WILSON v. Coastline Management Group, Inc.
as 1:2016cv21378
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY M. WILSON
Defendant:
Coastline Management Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Wilson et al v. PNK (River City), LLC.
as 4:2015cv00380
Plaintiff:
Lawrence M. Wilson , Darren Metzger and Charles Patterson
Defendant:
PNK (River City), LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Wilson v. Mattress Firm, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00407
Plaintiff:
Keith M. Wilson
Defendant:
Mattress Firm, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
BANKS et al v. RADIO SHACK CORPORATION
as 2:2013cv00685
Plaintiff:
MELVIN BANKS and JONICE M. WILSON
Defendant:
RADIO SHACK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
WILSON v. BRIDGES OF INDIANA, INC.
as 2:2011cv00097
Defendant:
BRIDGES OF INDIANA, INC.
Plaintiff:
THERESA M. WILSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wilson v. Beachside Investment Of Brevard, Inc et al
as 6:2010cv01027
Plaintiff:
June M. Wilson
Defendant:
Beachside Investment Of Brevard, Inc and Jerry Roberts
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
