Cases 1 - 10 of 202
Pereira v. City Of San Jose
as 5:2024cv01772
Plaintiff:
Mr. Michael R Pereira
Defendant:
City Of San Jose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pereira-Nolasco v. Garland
as 24-1246
Petitioner:
LAURA ANGELICA PEREIRA-NOLASCO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pereira v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Northwest
as 3:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Alesha Pereira
Defendant:
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Northwest
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Martins, et al. v. Garland
as 24-86
Petitioner:
REGINALDO MARTINS, YASMIN RAMOS MARTINS, FABIANA PEREIRA RAMOS MARTINS and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pereira de Oliveira, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4123
Petitioner:
NARA CINTIA PEREIRA DE OLIVEIRA and JOAO VITOR PEREIRA DE ARAUJO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pereira Fontes, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4124
Petitioner:
DENILSON PEREIRA FONTES, JESSICA ANTONIA DA SILVA and MARCELLA ANTONIA DA SILVA-MENDES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Brooks v. Tenney et al
as 4:2023cv05163
Plaintiff:
Carl Alonzo Brooks
Defendant:
Nancy Tenney, Corey Endo, K. Gallagher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Da Silva Pereira, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3583
Petitioner:
FLAVIO DA SILVA PEREIRA, LEILIANE FRITZ MACEDO, VICTOR HUGO FRITZ PEREIRA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ruiz v. Nieto et al
as 2:2023cv02309
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Defendant:
Enrique Pena Nieto, Salvador Cienfuegos Zepeda, Jesus Gabriel Lopez Benitez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Villaescusa et al v. GrubHub Holdings Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv08030
Plaintiff:
Richard Villaescusa and Alexandre Torres Pereira
Defendant:
GrubHub Holdings Inc., GrubHub, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
