Cases 1 - 10 of 35,483
Doe #1 MKC et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (MKC) and John Doe #2 (JAS)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #066 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
John Doe #066
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cobble et al v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
David Cobble and American Citizens
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Brad Raffensperger, Alexander Soros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reaves et al v. Kyler et al
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves, Tiesha Danielle Evans and Dmitri A. Reaves
Defendant:
David Levert Kyler, Officer Sutton, County of Richmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Williams v. Dart Transit Company [US DOT#75525] et al
as 2:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Gerrick Darell Williams
Defendant:
Dart Transit Company [US DOT#75525], Fleetline doing business as Dart Transit Company, Quantrez Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mellott v. Johnson
as 3:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
William Howard Mellott, II
Defendant:
Charlie B. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
BELILLA v. PLANTE et al
as 4:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
VICTOR BELILLA
Defendant:
WILLIAM PLANTE and NATALIA AZIZE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stancuna v. Town of Westport et al
as 3:2024cv00848
Plaintiff:
Marin Stancuna
Defendant:
Town of Westport and William Harmer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
