Cases 41 - 50 of 2,417
Betancourt et al v. BronxCare Health System et al
as 1:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Osbed Betancourt and Nickole Hutchinson
Defendant:
BronxCare Health System and Shirley Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
United States of America v. Acevedo
as 24-67
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE ACEVEDO and Sealed Defendant 1
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ARCHIE v. ACEVEDO et al
as 3:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
ERNEST LEE ARCHIE, JR
Defendant:
JELO ACEVEDO and CHIP SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acevedo v. Regions Bank
as 7:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Acevedo
Defendant:
Regions Bank Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Segura Acevedo v. Garland
as 23-4266
Petitioner:
IGNACIO SEGURA ACEVEDO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Buder et al v. The Fire Department of the City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv10890
Plaintiff:
Christopher Buder, Ceasar Holloway, Ferdinand Bonifacio and others
Defendant:
The Fire Department of the City of New York and CITY OF NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Frank Dominguez v. County of Los Angeles California et al
as 2:2023cv10523
Plaintiff:
Frank Dominguez
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles California, Juan Madrigal, Kathryn Barger and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
