Cases 1 - 10 of 473
Adolph v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00649
Plaintiff:
Doris Adolph
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dai et al v. SAS Institute Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02537
Plaintiff:
Hanson Dai, Max Chiswick, Adolph Robles and others
Defendant:
SAS Institute Inc., Ideas Inc., Choice Hotels International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
White VS Garland et.al.
as 3:2024cv00076
Defendant:
Veronica Escobar, Merrick Garland, Veronica Escobar (Pleters) and others
Plaintiff:
Leeland O. White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Arduini v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Richard Adolph Arduini and Richard Adolph Arduini, Jr.
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
United States v. Adonis Dorman
as 23-3734
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Adonis Adolph Dorman
United States v. Adonis Dorman
as 23-3738
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Adonis Adolph Dorman
Angulo et al v. Clowns.com, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10983
Defendant:
Adolph Rodriguez, Clowns.com, Inc., George Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Brayan Angulo, Cameron Pille, Janina Salorio and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shamley (Zamora), David v. Suter, Christine et al
as 3:2023cv00815
Plaintiff:
David Adolph Shamley (Zamora)
Defendant:
Christine Suter, Jason Wunderlich and Christopher O'Brian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2966
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
