Cases 1 - 10 of 735
Bagley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Richard Calvin Bagley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lettieri v. Roemer et al
as 6:2024cv06335
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Michael J. Roemer, Paul E. Bonanno, Jeffery L. Bagley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Roemer et al
as 1:2024cv02218
Plaintiff:
David Lettieri
Defendant:
Michael J. Roemer, Paul E. Bonanno, Jeffery L. Bagley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: AT&T Date Breach Litigation.
as 3:2024cv00757
Plaintiff:
Alex Petroski, Andrew March, Nicholas Nelli and others
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
In Re: AT&T Date Breach Litigation.
as TXN/3:24-CV-00757
Plaintiff:
Petroski, Alex Petroski, Andrew March and others
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Bagley v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
Lacrista A Bagley
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Bagley et al v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv10974
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Bagley and Kristina Daugirdas
Defendant:
United States of America
Snyder v. Bagley, et al
as 24-4011
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND MAX SNYDER
Defendant:
JUDGE MARVIN BAGLEY, individually and in his official capacity as Justice of the Sixth Judicial District Court of Sevier County, AMERICAN FAMILY INSURANCE, LAUARA ANN LISK and others
Lettieri v. Department of Justice
as 24-676
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. LETTIERI, (John Doe)
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, WYOMING COUNTY SHERIFFS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
