Cases 41 - 50 of 8,058
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
SEVERINO v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE et al
as 3:2019cv19164
Defendant:
ANDREW CAREY, WILLIAM F. SEVERINO, III, DETECTIVE BECKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP et al
as 1:2021cv01628
Plaintiff:
John Jones
Defendant:
Landmark Infrastructure Partners LP, Arthur P. Breazy, Jr., Keith Benson and others
HOPKINS v. LANDMARK INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS LP et al
as 2:2021cv05128
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOPKINS
Defendant:
LANDMARK INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS LP, STEVEN M SONNENSTEIN, SADIQ MALIK and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Steinberg v. PA State Board of Pharmacy et al
as 1:2021cv01652
Plaintiff:
Norman Steinberg
Defendant:
PA State Board of Pharmacy, Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs, K. Kalonji Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv16953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Bonavitacola v. Ownes-Illinois, et al
as 2:2021cv60008
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Bonavitacola, Sr. and Rita Bonavitacola
Defendant:
Inc. Owens-Illinois, OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS COMPANY, KEENE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAREY v. LARDIN et al
as 2:2021cv01408
Plaintiff:
DUWAN CAREY
Defendant:
DUWAYNE LARDIN and ANDREW KESSLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CAREY v. LORDIN et al
as 2:2021cv01412
Plaintiff:
DUWON CAREY and DUWAN CAREY
Defendant:
DUWAYNE LORDIN, ANDREW KESSLER and DUWAYNE LARDIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TALBERT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv04303
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JAMES KENNEY, BRAD LUKACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
