Cases 21 - 30 of 251
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Tina Carey v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 23-1724
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Tina Carey
Defendant / Appellant:
DST Systems, Inc.
Hollis Larson v. Minnesota Sex Offender Program, et al
as 23-1140
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hollis J. Larson
Defendant / Appellee:
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, (MSOP), Lucinda Jesson, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities., Cal Ludeman, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities. and others
Ballard v. Nelnet Servicing, LLC
as 4:2022cv03185
Plaintiff:
Carey M. Ballard
Defendant:
Nelnet Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Whitaker v. Wilson et al
as 5:2022cv06089
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Whitaker
Defendant:
Sheryl Wilson, Aaron Githens, Karen Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinn et al v. Doherty et al
as 0:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Jenifer Quinn, A.D. and L.J.
Defendant:
Patricia Doherty, Kathryn Joo, Christina Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tina Carey v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 21-3664
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Tina Carey
Defendant / Appellant:
DST Systems, Inc.
Prouty v. Miles et al
as 0:2021cv02227
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
David Miles, Jessica Joyal, Steve Sajdak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. DHS-MSOP employees et al.
as 0:2021cv02207
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
DHS-MSOP employees, Nicole Kielty, Jessica Joyal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. Miles et al
as 0:2021cv02179
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
David Miles, Jeremy Wouri, Sue Swansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
