Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Jackson v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
Michele Chatman Jackson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Henrietta Bush Chatman vs. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00628
Plaintiff:
Henrietta Bush Chatman and Kilolo Kijakzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
STEVENSON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00813
Plaintiff:
TINA CHATMAN STEVENSON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Chatman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv06388
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Chatman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Zachary Yost-Chatman v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv05114
Plaintiff:
Zachary Yost-Chatman
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Chatman v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
Elvis Alonzo Chatman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Chatman v. Saul
as 1:2020cv07279
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Lapria Lashawn Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Chatman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv06534
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Chatman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Chatman v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2019cv01043
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Plaintiff:
Annette Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Chatman v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv00475
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Chatman
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
