Cases 1 - 10 of 2,082
Clark v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Amanda K. Clark
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Clark v. Pulaski County, Arkansas
as 4:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Britney Clark
Defendant:
Pulaski County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Clark v. Navvis and Company, LLC
as 4:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Detrick Clark
Defendant:
Navvis and Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Musick et al v. Woodside Racquet Club Management, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Kelli Musick and Clark Persinger
Defendant:
Woodside Racquet Club Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Clarke v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn Rodee Clarke
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Horvath Towers VI, LLC v. Clark County Board of Adjustment, South Dakota
as 1:2024cv01008
Plaintiff:
Horvath Towers VI, LLC
Defendant:
Clark County Board of Adjustment, South Dakota
Shawn Spottswood v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 24-1520
Petitioner:
Shawn Clarke Spottswood
Respondent:
State of Minnesota and Washington County, 10th Judicial District
Clark v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Matthew L. Clark
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Clark v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Matthew L. Clark
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Campbell et al v. Schroeder et al
as 0:2024cv00913
Plaintiff:
Venedia Larita Campbell and Martin Alan Smith, II
Defendant:
Andrew William Schroeder, Kyle Allen Williams, Paul Franz Albers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
