Cases 21 - 30 of 5,973
Reginald Wright v. Commonwealth of Virginia Dept. of Child Support
as 24-1321
Plaintiff:
REGINALD WRIGHT
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, VERLITA HARRIS, individually and in her official capacity as an Operations Manager, LAURA MCVAY, individually and in her capacity as a Child Support Attorney and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02790
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
LATIMORE v. JONES et al
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
AYAD S LATIMORE
Defendant:
MIKAL JONES, ASHLEY N CUELLAR, DAVID HARDGRAVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mkhitaryan v. County of Clark
as 2:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
Sergey Mkhitaryan
Defendant:
County of Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lemus v. Clark County School District et al
as 2:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
Rosa Lainez Lemus
Defendant:
Clark County School District, Dr. Jesus F. Jara, Ronnie Guerzon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. NYCHA
as 1:2024cv02741
Plaintiff:
Sean A. Clark
Defendant:
NYCHA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bolden v. Clark County et al
as 2:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Jason J. Bolden
Defendant:
Clark County, Michael J. Scarborough, Benjamin J. Nadig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Pulaski County, Arkansas
as 4:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Britney Clark
Defendant:
Pulaski County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
