Voting Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 104
Coalition for Good Governance et al v. Raffensperger et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02070
Plaintiff: Georgia Advancing Progress Political Action Committee, Ryan Graham, Patricia Pullar and others
Defendant: Brad Raffensperger, Anh Le, Rebecca N. Sullivan and others
Amicus Curiae: Georgia First Amendment Foundation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sixth District of the African Methodist Episcopal Church et al v. Kemp et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01284
Defendant: Wandy Taylor, Tim McFalls, Rocky Raffle and others
Plaintiff: Georgia Muslim Voter Project, Latino Community Fund of Georgia, Women Watch Afrika and others
Intervenor Defendant: Republican National Committee, National Republican Senatorial Committee, National Republican Congressional Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10301
Georgia Republican Party, Inc. et al v. Raffensperger et al
as 2:2020cv00135
Defendant: Thomas Mahoney, III, Tommy Clark, David J. Worley and others
Plaintiff: Perdue For Senate, National Republican Senatorial Committee, Jean M. Seaver and others
Intervenor Defendant: DSCC and Democratic Party of Georgia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokke et al v. Cegavske et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv02046
Defendant: Barbara K. Cegavske and Joseph P. Gloria
Plaintiff: Chris Prudhome, Rodimer for Congress, Merchant for Congress and others
Intervenor Defendant: Nevada State Democratic Party and Democratic National Committee
Amicus Curiae: Clark County Democratic Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WISE et al v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00912
Intervenor Defendant: JADE JUREK, ROSALYN KOCIEMBA, TOM KOCIEMBA and others
Plaintiff: NORTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN PARTY, DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC., DANIEL BISHOP and others
Defendant: KAREN BRINSON BELL, NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, JEFF CARMON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEMOCRACY NORTH CAROLINA et al v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00457
Plaintiff: DONNA PERMAR, REGINA WHITNEY EDWARDS, ROBERT K PRIDDY II and others
Defendant: NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DAVID C BLACK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Clark et al v. Edwards et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00308
Plaintiff: Telisa Clark, Lakeshia Barnett, Martha Christian Green and others
Defendant: John Bel Edwards, Rhonda Rogers, Attorney General Jeff Landry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
NIELSEN et al v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2020cv00236
Defendant: GLENDA B. WILLIAMS, ASHLEY MOODY, SHARON CHASON and others
Plaintiff: MORGAN OUTLAW, FLORIDA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS, RAY DAVIS and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: CELCIO EDUARDO ROMERO, PAULINA HERNANDEZ MORALES, BIANCA MARIA BAEZ and others
Intervenor Defendant: REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NAITONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and others
Intervenor: CARL F MCCOY, JAMES K KRACHT, DOUGLAS E HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS et al v. DESANTIS et al
as 1:2020cv00067
Plaintiff: Williams, KATHLEEN WINTERS, TERRIAYNA SPILLMAN and others
Defendant: DESANTIS, FLORIDA ELECTIONS CANVASSING COMMISSION, LAUREL M LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREDERICK et al v. LAWSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01959
Plaintiff: MARY J FREDERICK, WILLIAM L MARKS, JR., JOHN JUSTIN COLLIER and others
Defendant: M CATHERINE FINELLO, CONNIE LAWSON, RITA L GLENN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?