Cases 41 - 50 of 431
Day v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 0:2021cv02682
Plaintiff:
Peggy Day
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Clendening v. Day et al
as 3:2021cv03084
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ruben Clendening
Defendant:
Jason Day, Corporal David Everheart, Sergeant Bob Karcher or Calcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g
Clendening v. Roberson et al
as 3:2021cv03083
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ruben Clendening
Defendant:
Sheriff Tim Roberson, Jail Administrator Jason Day, Tessa Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Robertson et al
as 3:2021cv03081
Plaintiff:
Dewayne C Henderson
Defendant:
Tim Robertson, Jason Day and Jason Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Robertson et al
as 5:2021cv05216
Plaintiff:
Dewayne C Henderson
Defendant:
Tim Robertson, Jason Day and Jason Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowman et al v. Chambers et al
as 4:2021cv01406
Plaintiff:
John Bowman, Karen Cloyd, Glenn Koenen and others
Defendant:
Robert L. Chambers, Patricia Yaeger, Marsha E. Haeffner and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Becky Arps, Rene Artman, Adam Bohn and others
Petitioner:
Dr. Sam Page and Cora Faith Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Henderson v. Robertson et al
as 4:2021cv01169
Plaintiff:
Dewayne C Henderson
Defendant:
Tim Robertson, Jason Day and Jason Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clendening v. Wright et al
as 3:2021cv03079
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ruben Clendening
Defendant:
Jordon R. Wright, Jason Day, Jailer Jordon R. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Chandrique Day
as 21-3545
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Chandrique Day
Gamble v. Miller et al
as 4:2021cv00929
Plaintiff:
Chris Day Gamble
Defendant:
Phillip Miller and Clayton Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
