Cases 1 - 10 of 47
(PS) John-Reif v. Gray et al
as 2:2024cv00968
Plaintiff:
Daniel John-Reif
Defendant:
Ryan Gray, Sabrina Buis, Todd Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Goodrich v. City of Marion, Ohio et al.
as 3:2023cv02201
Plaintiff:
Donald Goodrich
Defendant:
City of Marion, Ohio, Austin Ray, Nicholas Kalb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Albert Thomas v. Governor of the State of Georgia, et al
as 23-10440
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA, DEBORAH GONZALEZ, JOHN W. DONNELLY and others
Albert Thomas v. Governor of Georgia, et al
as 22-13851
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF GEORGIA, DEBORAH GONZALEZ, JOHN W. DONNELLY and others
Albert Thomas v. Governor of the State of Georgia, et al
as 22-13858
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT CHARLES THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA, DEBORAH GONZALEZ, JOHN W. DONNELLY and others
Deem v. Schumer et al
as 7:2022cv08655
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Deem
Defendant:
Chuck Schumer, Jamaal Bowman, Kathy Hochul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Thomas v. Kemp et al
as 1:2022cv02064
Plaintiff:
Albert Charles Thomas
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Deborah Gonzalez, John W. Donnelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Albert Thomas v. Governor of the State of Georgia, et al
as 22-11638
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN KEMP, DEBORAH GONZALEZ, JOHN W. DONNELLY and others
Thomas v. Kemp et al
as 1:2022cv01475
Plaintiff:
Albert C. Thomas
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Deborah Gonzalez, John W. Donnelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
