Cases 1 - 10 of 6,105
Ousnamer v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2024cv11157
Plaintiff:
Keith E. Ousnamer
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Twichell v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Sarah E. Twichell
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Connolly v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv03075
Plaintiff:
Migdalia E Connolly
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lawyer v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05029
Plaintiff:
Rick E. Lawyer
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Vespoint v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
Heather E. Vespoint
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
WILLIAMS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv05140
Plaintiff:
DANA E. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Reeder v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Clayton E. Reeder
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Press v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv01841
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E. Press, II
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gutwein v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02949
Plaintiff:
Susan E Gutwein
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Madlock v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Carlos E. Madlock
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
General Counsel SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
