Cases 1 - 10 of 7,966
Adams v. South Carolina State University et al
as 5:2024cv02734
Plaintiff:
Alonzo E. Adams
Defendant:
South Carolina State University, National Football League and NFL Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
BUCKNER et al v. PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT E. MURRAY et al
as 1:2024cv01268
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL W. BUCKNER and JOSEPH R. RESCHINI
Defendant:
PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT E. MURRAY, BRENDA LOU MURRAY, CHAGRIN EXECUTIVE OFFICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Veras v. 240 E LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01530
Plaintiff:
Rafael Veras
Defendant:
240 E LLC and Chestnut Holdings of New York, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Aparicio v. Mar Tile Design Corp. et al
as 6:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Gustavo E. Aparicio
Defendant:
Mar Tile Design Corp. and Jose J. Herrera
Anderson v. Mesa Install Company LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00958
Plaintiff:
Sam E Anderson
Defendant:
Mesa Install Company LLC, Aire 1 LLC, Joseph Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Berry v. Bailey et al
as 5:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Heath Berry
Defendant:
William C Bailey, Robert E (Bud) Cramer, Jim Scanlon and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Conroy v. L E A M Drilling Services
as 6:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
John Alan Conroy
Defendant:
LEAM Drilling Services and R E M E L L C improperly named as L E A M Drilling Services doing business as L E A M Drilling Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Gil-Bolivar v. Evans & Paul LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03061
Plaintiff:
Giovanny Gil-Bolivar
Defendant:
Evans & Paul LLC, E&P Holdings 1, LLC and Jeffery Evans
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Seiber v. Shelby County Government
as 2:2024cv02261
Plaintiff:
Mary E Seiber
Defendant:
Shelby County Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Nathan Carroll v. Northampton Restaurants, Inc.
as 24-1354
Plaintiff:
NATHAN E. CARROLL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, GERALDINE P. CORRIGAN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, CRYSTAL A. BATEMAN and others
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON RESTAURANTS, INC., d/b/a Aberdeen Barn Steakhouse
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
