Cases 1 - 10 of 1,697
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
COTE v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2024cv02859
Petitioner:
RICHARD PAUL COTE
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Graham Schiff v. Anthony Brown
as 24-1408
Plaintiff:
GRAHAM HARRY SCHIFF
Defendant:
ANTHONY G. BROWN, Maryland Attorney General, JOHN MCCARTHY, Montgomery County State's Attorney, NICHOLAS PICERNO, Captain for Montgomery County Police and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Graham v. Experian Information Solutions Inc
as 4:2024cv01166
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Denise Graham
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPENCE v. TOLBERT et al
as 1:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
KENYON J. SPENCE
Defendant:
SGT. TOLBERT and SGT. LENWOOD GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
CITY OF GRAHAM v. THE 3M COMPANY et al
as 1:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
CITY OF GRAHAM
Defendant:
THE 3M COMPANY, AGC, INC., AGC CHEMICALS AMERICAS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
