Cases 1 - 10 of 565
Ervin v. Barnes et al
as 3:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Jackie Darrell Ervin
Defendant:
Brandon Barnes, Jamison Marriman, Dillian Seibers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamison v. Bass
as 3:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Detrayvo Jamison
Defendant:
Nolen Bass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Traylor v. Minnesota Dept of Corrections et al
as 0:2024cv01275
Plaintiff:
Rayco DelShaune Traylor
Defendant:
Minnesota Dept of Corrections, Binkley, Connors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Church v. Schnell et al
as 0:2024cv01235
Plaintiff:
Justin Dale Church
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Jamison Doeden, Kathryn Halverson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCargo v. Jamison
as 1:2024cv02280
Petitioner:
Kareem McCargo
Respondent:
Warden Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McCargo v. Jamison
as 1:2024cv02367
Petitioner:
Kareem McCargo
Respondent:
Warden Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Shine v. USA
as 3:2024cv00332
Petitioner:
Patrick Jamison Shine
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Moore v. Jamison
as 1:2024cv02095
Petitioner:
Paul Moore
Respondent:
Warden J. L. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Daniel Jamison v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6132
Plaintiff:
DANIEL W. PHOENIX, a/k/a Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, MARK AMONETTE, M.D., Chief Medical Officer, NATARCHA GREGG, M.S.A., RD., State Wide Dietician and others
Jamison v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2024cv00390
Petitioner:
Jean Jamison
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
