Cases 1 - 10 of 3,703
Jenkins v. Kim et al
as 1:2024cv03310
Plaintiff:
William J. Jenkins
Defendant:
Young Kim, Donna Petrauskis, Wellpath LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Vaughey et al
as 1:2024cv01063
Plaintiff:
Phillip Hill
Defendant:
John Vaughey, Jack Truppo Burbage, John Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockett et al v. Jenkins Correctional Center
as 6:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Cameron Lockett and Carlos White
Defendant:
Jenkins Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Paige et al
as 7:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Henry
Defendant:
Treandre D. Paige, VA DOC Department of Correction, Wallens Ridge State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Parkins v. Deigarion Staten, et al
as 24-1814
Plaintiff:
Michael Justin Parkins
Defendant:
Deigarion M. Staten, Corporal, East Arkansas Regional Unit, Scott Taylor, Major, East Arkansas Regional Unit, Watson, Lt., East Arkansas Regional Unit and others
JENKINS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY JENKINS
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Lewis v. Alan Greason, et al
as 24-1306
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LEROY LEWIS
Defendant:
ALAN GREASON, Assistant Warden, REGINA JENKINS-GRANT, Unit Manager, JENNIFER TORRES, Transfer Coordinator and others
ANDERSON v. TERRA et al
as 2:2024cv01471
Plaintiff:
KHALID ANDERSON
Defendant:
TERRA, JENKINS and K OWENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albert Anderson v. Reep
as 24-6339
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant:
REEP, Warden, DOUG NEWTON, Warden, FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Prison and others
Helton v. Jenkins
as 1:2024cv00633
Petitioner:
Norton Helton
Respondent:
Sylester L. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
