Cases 1 - 10 of 45,752
Soliz v. Nueces County
as 24-40353
Plaintiff:
Jesus Soliz
Defendant:
Nueces County, Armar Correctional Healthcare Services, Roberto Cano and others
Mola #365547 v. Ramirez
as 3:2024cv08096
Plaintiff:
John Mola
Defendant:
Hecter Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Jerone Alexander
Defendant:
Cynthia D Davis, Charles O'Connor, N. Brabson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. City of Middletown Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Christopher Robinson
Defendant:
City of Middletown Police Department, John Doe and John Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Asotin County et al
as 2:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Stephen R Jackson, Sr
Defendant:
Asotin County, Asotin County Sheriffs Department, John Hilderbrand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Childs, Shareef v. Buesgen, C. et al
as 3:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Shareef Childs
Defendant:
C. Buesgen, Zemaitis, John Doe Correctional Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wayne v. Hawes et al
as 7:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Robert James Wayne
Defendant:
Spencer Hawes, Kyle Irving, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01280
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Johnson
Defendant:
Anthony D. Wills, Nurse Crane, Nurse Crain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Doe #1 et al
as 3:2024cv01285
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Doe #1 et al
as 3:2024cv01288
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
